My Academic Adventure
Sharing my intellectual discoveries mostly about history, Middle East, diversity and women voices and ethnic minorities. An academic journey to new facts and realities in a world on the run.
Monday, June 29, 2026
Reckoning with the GDR past
Wednesday, June 24, 2026
Revolution and International Order
I am very late with my academic updates, but hopefully will be able post more in the next days and weeks. With an international order dramatically challenged, and a chaos - at least in terms of micro-historical decisions - taking over the ´order´ it is almost impossible to keep staying immersed in theoretical analysis. Reality - at least those days - is far beyond the imagination, therefore, the need to first observe the changes and make an assessment only if necessary and definitely only taking into account a very limited level of predictability.
The Internationalists and Their Plan to Outlaw War by Oona A. Hathaway and Scott J. Shapiro is a very serious, documented account of a dream: ending the war and turning the international conversation into the register of peace negotiations. A rationale approach of a dream shaped by the unjustly ignored 1928 Peace Pact, at a time when the wounds of one war were starting to heal, while another one was looming silently.
It is a fascinating and very comprehensive overview taking into consideration juridic and historical arguments. The book doesn´t explain though the limited extent such a dream was successful in the international realm, particularly during and after the end of the Cold War.
The information contained in the book is very vaste and acribic, and it may offer a lot of - pros and cons - arguments for the international law specialists.
The Revolutionists by The Guardian international correspondent Jason Burke may offer a counter-balance to the coldness of international law approaches. Undertitled ´The Story of the Extremists Who Hijacked the 1970s´, it may actually explain part of the non-pacifistic orientation of our times.
The domains of the two books are different, if not opposite, but reading them together I was able to fill some of the gaps and questions left unanswered by The Internationalists. The tormented events of those years are still shaping our international realities, more than the - normal - desire of peace.
The international order was therefore challenged by non-state terrorist actors and this state of affairs continues until today. Non-state actors reclaiming state attention, attacking state institutions and being answered with state-ordained strength, while reclaiming extra priviledged as theoretically being a minority force in a non-state de jure position.
Being written by a journalist, it does not spare too much time diving into theories, but the facts are well structured offering a good research basis for anyone interested in stories of political extremism and terrorism in the 1970s.
Thursday, March 5, 2026
A Manhattan Cult Story
![]() |
| A memoir |
Friday, February 20, 2026
Remember Hanau
Tuesday, November 11, 2025
A Bit about the Franco-German Collaboration
I haven´t covered in a very long time European-related topics, and I still need more time to update some of my previous information in this field. However, the constant flux of news regarding the current situation in Europe, especially the impact of the war in Ukraine on the everyday life of European citizens - particularly the recent security threats and cybersecurity risks - forced me to speed up a bit the process.
But as I was listening tonight to the very interesting remarks of the participants to the Freedom Tech Forum generously hosted by the Embassy of France in Germany, I realized that although the risks are different compared to let´s say, ten years ago, the stage of the discussion - a stronger French-German European engine, the punctual collaboration in the field of defense, the regrets of the unachieved project of a European Army - is turning in the same circles.
Politically, the cards never been better for the franco-german collaboration: the current German chancellor has strong French afinities, including geographically and president Macron wants a stronger French presence in Europe which cannot achieved without the German support. Since the Toulon Summit this August, a couple of initiatives are ongoing or further supported, particularly in the field of defense and cybersecurity. Germany, whose economy is going through a pronounced decline for a couple of years already, with the car industry being unable to compete with the world economic trends, particularly Made in China, in need of a reorientation that the defense industry can provide generously. Next week, Macron will be in Berlin to participate to a bilateral summit dedicated to the digital sovereignty that may given even more impetus to the bilateral projects.
Indeed, now it is the right moment - last train, some may say - for increasing the collaboration. But what about the day after, when maybe the politicians supporting it will be no more in the forefront? Do we need to wait again for a happy configuration of sorts, like an alignment of stars, to hope for an operational French-German European politics? Caught unprepared for the challenges of a (conflictual) multi-polar world, not of the friendliest type, threatened by aggressive non-democracies who infiltrated its very own members, the political Europe needs more than friendly politicians. It needs on one side long-term visions of a common democratic future and mechanisms of defending democracy, including against its very own demons. Politicians alone cannot succeed, they need the common concert of all democratical actors to inform, react and generate democratic solutions.
Tuesday, November 4, 2025
AI and (German) Accents
Willingly - because one cannot stay behind for ever, be it for bending to the God of ´data protection´ - and unwillingly - due to efficiency and cost-relatedissues, AI is getting more and more used in Germany.´More and more´ in local terms means less than 10% of what is achieved in other countries but this is for another time.
Since summer, big doctor´s offices or postal services are intensively using AI for making appointments or answering various organisatorical - not medical - aspects. It may save time from waiting on the line, for long minutes or even close to one hour. It can also allow a swift assignment of tasks either to an online AI-generated service or to the department in charge with your request.
But...but there are some small details that I will definitely love to research into more depth in the following weeks and months. The system, as far as I had the chance to personally test until now, it is operational in German, it is trained to cater to the German-speaking audience, speaking professional - hoch - German by individuals bearing German names.
Today, I´ve tested for several occasions such a system, using various accents and non-German sounding names and every time I failed to achieve the aimed results: the bot couldn´t understand what was the request, could not reproduce the sound of the name correctly etc.
Imagine then the difficulties a non-German, speaking correctly although not free of accent would have while using the system. How disadvantaged this person will be and how frustrated they may be because unable to secure a ´holy´ appointment or to be transferred to the right ´human´ operator.
An issue that definitely deserves more attention and probably extended institutional answers.





