Saturday, March 16, 2019

About Academic Shame

One of my best friends during my university years was a very ambitious young girl whose parents were barely reading and writing and who was ambitious enough to get a superb scholarship at Georgetown University. Her hardwork was an inspiration for me, and many others that were during those times more interested to test life, love and relationships instead of dedicating the best light hours to intensive study and exam preparations. At a certain extent, we knew that sooner or later we will find our place - because we were coming from middle-class families with a clear intellectual status in the society - therefore we did not have too prove that much. Meanwhile, my friend was catching up reading the books that we had included in our weekly reading plan or learning the languages our relatives started to practice with us at a very early age. We not even need to work too hard to pay our college debts because even if our parents were not always so well-off, there will be always some successful relative that probably will help with a loan one day, when the knife was getting closer to the skin.
It was good for America that a friend like mine, with a poor immigrant background, worked so hard to get into one of the most elitist universities, preparing future American diplomats. For me, it was an example that although nightmarish sometimes, the American dream is still working. And I am still convinced that hard work and dedication pays off, although nowadays it is getting harden and harder to cope with the post-university trauma of huge debts and the lack of social and professional integration. Why do you need so much hard work and financial pressure when once you graduated, you can hardly find a good academic or professional position, as most of the best jobs are offered based on a personal CV that counts less your academic achievements instead of your good family connections. With the right high-class connections you can have any job you want, regardless your grades and the circle is shrinking more and more each day.
The recent scandal involving bribes and favoritism in top league American universities as Yale, UCLA, USC and Standford is only one of the many examples in this respect. Although it involves mostly big money paid for admissions of athletes who couldn't play in various sport academic teams, it touches violently also to the ways in which people with a certain visibility consider that their children deserve a better place into the society. The fact that a protagonist from a movie called 'Desperate Housewives' wants her offspring to be part of the American intellectual elites and pays heavily for this - possibly with some of her years as well - tells a lot about what are we talking about. 
The fact that parents with an intellectual background want their children to be part of the same elites is not commendable in itself, but it does not request a more equal status than someone else. Let's compete and show your skills, but the departure point shall be the same. There is no genetical guarantee of brain further development or conservation from an intellectual generation to the other. 
The fact that politicians and well-offs offer themselves huge donations to universities although their deep system of belief is completely against the chore system of the said universities and societies in the middle of which those operate - remember the Muammar Gaddafi's links to LSE? - is a proof that the elites' system in our brave new world is getting through a deep crisis. No 'desperate' money will help this situation, until the entire crisis is evaluated in all its details. 
A clear and immediate answer - which has to do not only with America and its system, but has to do with the ways in which education operates and contributes to the overall reproduction of elites - would probably help avoiding a further wave of non-values and mediocrity in a system aimed to promote the difference between values and non-values.

Friday, March 8, 2019

The Need for Localisation

One of the most challenging part of writing and researching diversity - especially national and ethnic - is the need to be specific. The more vague, general and, theoretically, inclusive you are, the biggest the danger to be accused of misunderstanding and misleading the adequate definition of the topic you approach. 
My thoughts were pushed by a recent - with some academic notes - discussion I had on food. There could be specific criteria to declare a food tasty - education and cultural background being one of them - but when it comes to placing a food geographically, you can easily start a war. I am slowly slowly gathering more and more such testimonies - hopefully part of a book I hope to finish one day - one of the most famous - also because it has to do with an area which always burns - is the hummus war between Lebanon and Israel. As a final user, I might say that I love the hummus made by both Lebanese and Israeli cooks - although personally not a hummus lover because the food I grew up with was slightly different in taste and ingredients (call it bland, sometimes), but what exactly made a hummus to be made in Lebanon, respectively made in Israel is a matter of political choice, sometimes. 
Closer to home, the famous food appropriations of foods among the Balkan countries are less burning - right now - but in a small Serbian village might bring a lot of tensions if you label a food wrongly, as Croatian or Turkish. 
What you can really do in order to avoid such unpleasant political background to your plate - food to be enjoyed in a special ambiance and this is hopefully no big dispute about it - is to get into as many details as possible when describing a food. The details have to do with the special place where the meal was eaten and the very special details of the recipe. Some ingredients and ways to prepare might differ from a village to another and could be slightly altered from a family to another. Offering as many personal and individual details add a lot of zest to the recipe and the food story in general, as it opens up the ways to tell individual, subjective stories. 
The food love might lead to anthropological memories and could help recreate a world where table manners and customes as well as menus are part of individual narratives and histories. On the long term it can also create more enjoyable discussion about food besides setting up the world of fire for...a tasty bowl of hummus.