Manifesto for the 'slow professor'

After so many 'slow' movements in food and the everyday life in general, it was about time to approach the high-speed academic life from this perspective too. In previous academic blog posts I touched upon several times the idea of 'publish or die' and other high pressures - such as bureaucracy that I do not fancy at all, regardless its shapes and aims - that taint the fragile intellectual achivements of the academia. 

'Corporalization has compromised academic life and speed up the clock', complain the authors, who continue: 'In the corporate university, power is transferred from faculty to managers, economic justifications dominate and the familiar 'bottom line' eclipses pedagogical and intellectual concerns'. However, as long as the universities are part of the state system and do receive budget funding, a certain scrutinity of the funds and criteria of performance should be considered. Also, universities are part of a larger state conception on education and, thus, they prepare future members of the work force. What can be done?

The authors pledge for a reconsideration of the academic pace: 'We need time to think, and so do our students. Time for reflection and open-end inquiry. 

One of the highest pressure the professors should deal with is time. Time to correct and edit papers, to apply for grants, to write books, to answer bureaucratic demands, to spend time with the family. Although several books were dedicated to the time-management issues in the academia, this does not alleviate the burden and the deep guilt for the time spent not 'at work'. Somehow, the book does not approach the issue of the high level of university graduates, compared to decades ago, which creates pressure for the market and the need of high efficiency at the university workplace too. 

An interesting approach concerns the pledge for 'pleassure' at teaching, a focus on emotions and emotional intelligence in the classroom. Hard sciences as mathematics or nuclear physics, just to mention randomly, do not necessarily require such an emotional involvement, but very often during my academic expriences I noticed the lack of any personal involvement of teachers in the process of sharing knowledge. 

Understanding is more important than knowledge, consider the authors, and I agree, but in the nowadays world, with so many sources of information and so many possibilities to expand the knowledge, it is very hard to resist the temptation of too much knowledge. I am going through this right now and secretely I enjoy the pleasure of not being able to find the right balance.

The book is very important for the stage of academic discussions right now, but it does not provide any specific mean of action, despite the need of more collaboration and 'conviviality' among teachers. I will be curious to find out how exactly the current culture can be institutionally challenged. Maybe then I will finally decide to make the big step of joining the academia. 

Disclaimer: Book offered by the publisher in exchange of an honest review 

Mental health in academia

I am not necessarily qualified to muse about academic life, but the long-term friendships and my never ending curiosity about intellectual life, often brought me in the vicinity of stories that might involve a drop of mental health. How much mental illness is part of the daily academic life all over the world might probably the topic of a big book dealing not only the statistics and social-economic information, but also the ways in which the 'normal' outside world is seeing the 'intellectual', most often as a strange, unusual, at the limit mentally ill person.

There are a lot of reasons mentioned usually as the cause of the overall alienation of academics: social pressure, the academic pressure towards productivity, sometimes the scarcity of funds or the anxiety of waiting for new sources of incomes, the lack of proper jobs and the high competitiveness of an oversaturated market. The 'illness' that can include various degrees of depression, anxiety, sleep issues and also various addictions, from alcoholism to drugs, is part of a repertoire that I assume there were always around the corner of universities. And I am relying upon not only various literary descriptions, but also various inside stories I kept hearing about academics of all colours since my early years of life. 'Date but not marry an academic' - an advise that sounds so painful when refers to women - is a kind of course that says a lot about how academics can be sometimes perceived in various societies, including in our so-called highly developed Western world. 

Is mental health a real problem in academia?

So, is mental health a real problem after all? Of course it is, and it is very important to discuss about it and find proper networks of support. Although I am a big lover of science and medicine, I am not always sure that therapy is a cure-all. Obviously the qualified help is very important when it comes to dealing with serious mental disorders - how to define them is another issue that has to do with the social perception of different maladies - but it is not enough to help, as long as the academic is going back to the same environment and unsolved problems - among others, how to pay a huge debt and how to find a good decently paid job, while trying to have a minimal social interaction. 

What I think it creates a lot of opportunities for the long-term installation of mental problems is the solitude. Intellectual work is supposed to be done alone, and the many hours spent documenting your articles request almost perfect solitude. The tight deadlines, the crazy schedule of conferences and the long hours of teaching and counselling rarely leave too much time for a normal family or relationships. The academic friendships can be problematic, as long as everyone is focused on his/her own work and competitiveness oblige, there is always a need of privacy and secrecy about what we read and write. 

Life and social challenges

As for the family, maybe they are too far away, maybe we consider ourselves too sophisticated to enjoy their simple and not intellectually challenging company. We assume that we are always in the right company, with our very interesting academic peers, but once the discussion is over, everyone is going home and not many will have too much intuition to call you when you feel sick or lonely.

Maybe such considerations put me in expectation around the real academic circle and always in between worlds. But there is always something more than that. There is something wrong with the intellectual models publicized via academic institutions and works and this should maybe explain some of the failures of intellectual involvement in the 'real life'. The sooner we open the floor to a honest discussion about such issues, the better for the sake of our academic and social sanity.